|
Iceland's Scandinavian-type social-market economy combines a capitalist structure and free-market principles with an extensive welfare system. Prior to the 2008 crisis, Iceland had achieved high growth, low unemployment, and a remarkably even distribution of income. The economy depends heavily on the fishing industry, which provides 40% of export earnings, more than 12% of GDP, and employs 7% of the work force. It remains sensitive to declining fish stocks as well as to fluctuations in world prices for its main exports: fish and fish products, aluminum, and ferrosilicon. Iceland's economy has been diversifying into manufacturing and service industries in the last decade, new developments in software production, biotechnology, and tourism. Abundant geothermal and hydropower sources have attracted substantial foreign investment in the aluminum sector and boosted economic growth, although the financial crisis has put several investment projects on hold. Much of Iceland's economic growth in recent years came as the result of a boom in domestic demand following the rapid expansion of the country's financial sector. Domestic banks expanded aggressively in foreign markets, and consumers and businesses borrowed heavily in foreign currencies, following the privatization of the banking sector in the early 2000s. Worsening global financial conditions throughout 2008 resulted in a sharp depreciation of the krona vis-a-vis other major currencies. The foreign exposure of Icelandic banks, whose loans and other assets totaled more than 10 times the country's GDP, became unsustainable. Iceland's three largest banks collapsed in late 2008. The country secured over $10 billion in loans from the IMF and other countries to stabilize its currency and financial sector, and to back government guarantees for foreign deposits in Icelandic banks. GDP fell 6.6% in 2009, and unemployment peaked at 9.4% in February 2009. GDP growth is expected to be near zero in 2010. Since the collapse of Iceland's financial sector, government economic priorities have included stabilizing the krona, reducing Iceland's high budget deficit, containing inflation, restructuring the financial sector, and diversifying the economy. Three new banks were established to take over the domestic assets of the collapsed banks. Two of them have foreign majority ownership, while the State holds a majority of the shares of the third. British and Dutch authorities have pressed claims against Icelandic Landsbanki to compensate their citizens for losses suffered on deposits held in that bank. The collapse of the financial system initially led to a major shift in opinion in favor of joining the EU and adopting the euro, although support has dropped substantially because of concern about losing control of their fishing resources and in reaction to measures taken by EU partners following the financial crisis.
|
|
|
$12.15 billion (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 142
$12.99 billion (2008 est.)
$12.87 billion (2007 est.)
note:
data are in 2009 US dollars
|
|
|
$12.13 billion (2009 est.)
|
|
|
-6.5% (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 197
1% (2008 est.)
6% (2007 est.)
|
|
|
$39,600 (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 20
$42,700 (2008 est.)
$42,600 (2007 est.)
note:
data are in 2009 US dollars
|
|
|
agriculture: 5.2%
industry:
24%
services:
70.8% (2009 est.)
|
|
|
180,900 (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 173
|
|
|
agriculture: 4.8%
industry:
22.2%
services:
73% (2008)
|
|
|
8.2% (December 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 91
4.8% (December 2008 est.)
note:
this figure climbed to 9.4% as of February 2009
|
|
|
NA%
|
|
|
lowest 10%: NA%
highest 10%:
NA%
|
|
|
28 (2006)
country comparison to the world: 123
25 (2005)
|
|
|
14.1% of GDP (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 139
|
|
|
revenues: $4.844 billion
expenditures:
$6.729 billion (2009 est.)
|
|
|
107.6% of GDP (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 9
55.9% of GDP (2008 est.)
|
|
|
12% (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 203
12.7% (2008 est.)
|
|
|
11.5% (31 December 2009)
country comparison to the world: 6
22% (31 December 2008)
|
|
|
NA% (31 December 2008)
country comparison to the world: 17
19.29% (31 December 2007)
|
|
|
$4.83 billion (30 September 2009)
country comparison to the world: 69
$4.71 billion (31 December 2008)
|
|
|
$3.44 billion (31 December 2008)
country comparison to the world: 94
$3.55 billion (31 December 2008)
|
|
|
$NA (31 December 2008)
$49.67 billion (31 December 2006)
|
|
|
$1.67 billion (31 December 2009)
country comparison to the world: 77
$5.557 billion (31 December 2008)
$40.56 billion (31 December 2007)
|
|
|
potatoes, green vegetables; mutton, chicken, pork, beef, dairy products; fish
|
|
|
fish processing; aluminum smelting, ferrosilicon production; geothermal power, hydropower, tourism
|
|
|
-10% (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 141
|
|
|
16.84 billion kWh (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 74
|
|
|
16.48 billion kWh (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 74
|
|
|
0 kWh (2008 est.)
|
|
|
0 kWh (2008 est.)
|
|
|
0 bbl/day (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 173
|
|
|
18,900 bbl/day (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 130
|
|
|
2,975 bbl/day (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 110
|
|
|
17,510 bbl/day (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 117
|
|
|
0 bbl (1 January 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 169
|
|
|
0 cu m (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 175
|
|
|
0 cu m (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 144
|
|
|
0 cu m (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 172
|
|
|
0 cu m (2008 est.)
country comparison to the world: 175
|
|
|
0 cu m (1 January 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 160
|
|
|
-$409 million (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 109
-$3.572 billion (2008 est.)
|
|
|
$4.02 billion (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 110
$5.399 billion (2008 est.)
|
|
|
fish and fish products 40%, aluminum, animal products, ferrosilicon, diatomite
|
|
|
Netherlands 30.71%, UK 12.73%, Germany 11.21%, Norway 5.75%, Spain 4.82% (2009)
|
|
|
$3.311 billion (2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 133
$5.699 billion (2008 est.)
|
|
|
machinery and equipment, petroleum products, foodstuffs, textiles
|
|
|
Norway 12.97%, Netherlands 8.62%, Germany 8.3%, Sweden 8.03%, Denmark 7.27%, US 6.94%, China 4.98%, UK 4.55%, Brazil 4.09% (2009)
|
|
|
$3.883 billion (31 December 2009 est.)
country comparison to the world: 89
$3.57 billion (31 December 2008 est.)
|
|
|
$3.073 billion (2002)
country comparison to the world: 120
|
|
|
$NA
$9.2 billion (31 December 2008)
|
|
|
$NA
$8.8 billion (31 December 2008)
|
|
|
Icelandic kronur (ISK) per US dollar - 128.417 (2009), 85.619 (2008), 63.391 (2007), 70.195 (2006), 62.982 (2005)
|
|
|